Regulus Therapeutics (Nasdaq: RGLS) - The little king of RNA
I learned yesterday that Bell Potter had managed to hire my
replacement as senior healthcare analyst. John Hester used to be with John
Bowie-Wilson’s Linwar Securities and more recently had been with a boutique
called Select Equities after the ANZ bank shut Linwar down last year. For various reasons I had
been hoping that my old employer wouldn’t find anyone up to the job. I now
bring to mind the famous quote from Charles De Gaulle “The graveyards are full
of indispensable men”.
Let’s talk about a field of the Life Sciences that is very
much alive and likely to prove indispensable to modern medicine sometime down
the track – RNA therapeutics. RNA, as just about everyone knows, is the
material used to translate the DNA from the nucleus of our cells into the proteins
that make up just about everything in our bodies. Modulate the RNA that creates
too much or too little of a particular protein, or the wrong kind of protein,
and you theoretically have a way to treat hitherto incurable diseases. The
devil, of course, is in the detail. Exactly what gene or genes do you need to interfere
with? What kind of nucleic acid, peptide, or small molecule do you do it with?
And how do you get your therapeutic into the cells where it can do its work? So
far none of these questions appear to have been answered to anyone’s
satisfaction. However the fact that a lot of progress has been made can be attested to the San Diego-based Regulus Therapeutics (Nasdaq: RGLS), which was
able to go public last year in an US$81m raise.
The first thing to like about Regulus is its name. As star gazers will know, Regulus is the brightest star in the constellation Leo, and its name means 'the little king'. Regulus’s beat is microRNA, the short strands of RNA which
regulate what messenger RNA takes to the ribosomes to turn into proteins.
MicroRNA, when it associates with a set of proteins called ‘RISC’ (short for RNA-induced silencing complex), is able to
target specific messenger RNA and stop it from converting to protein. Regulus
was created in 2007 when two other pioneers of the RNA therapeutics space -
Alnylam and Isis – pooled the intellectual property they didn’t need in order
to go after microRNA while they focused on their core technologies (siRNA in
the case of Alnylam, antisense in the case of Isis). MicroRNA could be a whole
lot bigger a field than siRNA or antisense because with MicroRNA whole networks of
disease-causing genes can be targeted. Indeed, there’s evidence that microRNA
works through RNAi to regulate perhaps a third of the whole genome.
Regulus, after it
has identified a microRNA target of interest, designs anti-microRNA
oligonucleotides, called ‘anti-miRs’, whose chemistry has been modified for
better stability, among other things. The company has some powerful friends.
With Sanofi it is going after liver cancer and kidney fibrosis. With GSK it’s
targeting Hepatitis C, where it could develop a much more differentiated
offering than those currently in the works from Gilead et. al. And with
AstraZeneca it is exploring anti-miRs that could be useful in atherosclerosis.
For its own account it has a glioblastoma candidate in the works. Add it all up
and these deals are worth US$1.7bn in milestones, of which ~US$100m gets paid
even before a patient gets dosed and US$350m kicks in during clinical
development. Regulus has only just gotten around to picking candidates this
year and doesn’t expect to file INDs until next year.
How much would
you expect to get in on the ground floor of microRNA drug development? Regulus
is currently capitalised at a generous US$343m, the stock having performed well
since last year’s arrival on Nasdaq. Part of the attraction is the Hepatitis C programme,
where the race is definitely on to find therapies that deliver above and beyond what the
current generation of small molecule antivirals has to offer. It’s worth noting
in this regard that Regulus’s CEO Kleanthis
Xanthopoulos was a founder of Anadys, which Roche bought in 2011 in order to go
after Hep C. Also attractive for investors is the Regulus board, whose all-star
cast includes, most notably, Caltech’s David Baltimore, the guy who
discovered retroviruses in the 1960s and who won the Nobel Prize for
Medicine for this in 1975 (and in whose lab Doug Hilton, the current WEHI director, worked for
a while).
So Regulus basically has rock star appeal. But as we've done several times this week and will continue to do in this blog, it's worth stopping and thinking about whom the market is missing in all this excitement. Come down to Sydney and Benitec (ASX: BLT) can show you how double-stranded RNAi (ddRNAi) is a unique RNA therapeutic approach with promise in a range of disease indications including Hepatitis C. Benitec is currently in the process of filing an IND for its TT‐034 gene silencing therapeutic ahead of a Phase II trial in Hep C, and that product, which can shut down three separate highly conserved regions on the virus genome simultaneously, has been designed as a 'one shot cure' for HCV infection. The Benitech folks are not rock stars - yet - but Kevin Buchi, the man who built Cephalon before it went to Teva, is a director, which tells you it's something worth looking into, particularly since it's only capped at A$24m.
Stuart Roberts, Australian Life Sciences consultant, with global focus
Nisi Dominus Frustra
Nisi Dominus Frustra
+61 (0)447 247 909
sroberts2164@gmail.com
Twitter @Biotech_buzz
About Stuart Roberts. I started as an analyst at the Sydney-based stockbroking firm Southern Cross Equities in April 2001, focused on the Life Sciences sector from February 2002. Southern Cross Equities was acquired by Bell Financial Group in 2008 and I continued at Bell Potter Securities until June 2013. Over the twelve years to 2013 I built a reputation as one of Australia's leading biotech analysts. I am currently consulting to the Australian biotech industry. Before joining Southern Cross Equities I wrote for The Intelligent Investor, probably the most readable investment publication in Australia. I have a Masters Degree in Finance from Finsia. My hobbies are jazz, cinema, US politics and reading patent applications filed by biotechnology and medical device companies.
Previous Australian Biotechnology Buzz posts:
Immunomedics (Nasdaq: IMMU), 21 August 2013
Oncolytics Biotech (Nasdaq: ONCY), 22 August 2013
Regulus Therapeutics (Nasdaq: RGLS), 23 August 2013
Disclaimer. This is commentary, not investment research. If you buy the stock of any biotech company in Australia, the US or wherever you need to do your own homework, and I mean, do your own homework. I'm not responsible if you lose money.
Immunomedics (Nasdaq: IMMU), 21 August 2013
Oncolytics Biotech (Nasdaq: ONCY), 22 August 2013
Regulus Therapeutics (Nasdaq: RGLS), 23 August 2013
Disclaimer. This is commentary, not investment research. If you buy the stock of any biotech company in Australia, the US or wherever you need to do your own homework, and I mean, do your own homework. I'm not responsible if you lose money.
Great blog. Will be interesting to see where Regulus gets to - high market cap for a company that still has only weak evidence for efficacy in humans (and in less well defined disease - research models are pure/single type). miRNA is also an area that is still being actively researched - there are networks of interactions. Success is by no means guaranteed.
ReplyDeleteBLT on the other hand looks to be using proven intervention delivered in a novel manner. siRNA for reducing gene expression is well understood. The faulty gene is definitely causal in the diseases being targeted - there is little doubt they are targeting the actual cause.
The novelty comes from the delivery of these siRNA's. By delivering them in dsRNA the cells own machinery can continue to produce the relevant siRNA to silence the problem gene. I'm looking forward to the results from their first-in-human trial of this permanent genetic therapy intervention.
BLT's main issue is where it's funding is coming from. Oz biotechs can move so slowly compared to the US ones -- even when the technology is superior. The Oz biotechs continue to have risk of being scooped by a faster US biotech with the next generation of therapy being faster.
Interesting comparison Stuart. I have wondered the same. How can there be such a disparity between the value of Regulus and Benitec? Benitec are at least a year in front for their HCV candidate, with 4 others creeping up the development pipeline. Regulus only have one active program at this stage. Speaking of rock-stars, Nobel Laureate David Baltimore has licenced Benitec's ddRNAi (through his company Calimmune) for his current Phase I/II for HIV/AIDS, based heavily on Benitec's prior work with the City of Hope. The first patients were dosed 4 weeks ago and an update is expected in 4 weeks time.
ReplyDelete